They always omit the obvious, case in point: Well done Todd K Autman Well said, verse here. Some masculine tops are submissive. And some feminine bottoms are dominating…. I have had two experiences where I have played the insertive role, while only receiving oral sex, not giving it. I explained to my partner in both occasions the reason for doing so considering myself straight, but curious. They were both fine with it. I am not sure if they were the bottom in their relationships with other gay men.
Although, they were both rather feminine… Guest In defense of the authors, they do address this in the main text of the paper. Mary Melendez its really interesting what is the way of gay for having sex? Your ignorance is overwhelming. To say nothing of your deplorable grammar skills. You deigned to respond because it is a value we all humans deserve. CodeStud3 Proves my point gays are absolutely devoid of substance.
Josh Whitfield Wait a sec?! Is this real all that important? What about those who are versatile? It seems to be that there is too much fixation on what someone does with thier genitals. I mean there are those who are agressive and submissive in romantic encounters. What are your preferences for form and function? In that way, gay men are way more picky than woman in life matters and sexual play, but also good at prioritizing their choices. It is actually a horrible shame that gay males cannot make genetically other male babies with each other in their lifetimes in this era.
Whereas most FemiNASTY women are anti-male and seek to sex up the bad boys while financially raping productive Beta Males and in the long run, degrade the value and strength of their local male gene lines. Michael Cooney There are some statistical errors with the paper e. That aside, the paper tries to tease out our actual ability to distinguish from our natural bias to classify men as tops that is, even knowing that half of the faces are tops and half are bottoms, people are categorizing more than half as tops and less than half as bottoms.
Some people are versatile. Some people just are not versatile, and no amount of shaming or head-scratching will change them. Nor should they have to change. Thanks for the read, SS team. Joe Conley Top and bottom, how heteronormative. But then, this is an area of research science i am very familiar with. For those who actually care about science along with the studies on the Golden Ratio and how it affects our perceptive judgment as early as a new born, my suggestion is to study the chemical biology behind Sociology and Psychology before irrationally commenting.
Is this really why you are willing to suffer the discrimination we all face, just so you end up as the clownish version of a straight pairing? What makes this study so unscientific is how they had little to no control over questions of grooming which can alter the perceived masculinity of a face drastically, from haircut, facial hair, plucked eyebrows, etc.
Covered in Tattoos, shaved head, work out, work on cars and Construction by trade….. I gotta say I think stereotypes are for the birds. Bardas I miss the criteria people use to indentify tops and bottoms, so this article is useless.